AUDIOMOTOR INTEGRATION AND CORTICAL PLASTICITY IN THE APPLICATION OF RHYTHMIC AUDITORY STIMULATION (RAS) IN POST-STROKE PATIENTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31891/pcs.2026.2.3

Keywords:

Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation, auditory–motor entrainment, stroke rehabilitation, gait recovery, cortical plasticity, sensorimotor integration, neuroplasticity, EEG, fMRI, motor timing, neurorehabilitation

Abstract

Gait impairment remains one of the leading causes of long-term disability after stroke, significantly limiting community mobility and quality of life. Despite advances in task-oriented rehabilitation, restoration of temporospatial gait symmetry and motor coordination remains challenging due to disrupted sensorimotor integration and impaired cortical network dynamics. Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS), grounded in the principles of auditory–motor entrainment, has emerged as a mechanism-based intervention targeting temporal organization of movement. Unlike purely biomechanical or peripheral stimulation approaches, RAS is hypothesized to modulate central neural timing mechanisms and promote adaptive neuroplasticity.

This study aimed to provide a comprehensive synthesis of recent evidence (2021–2025) regarding the clinical efficacy and neurophysiological mechanisms of RAS in post-stroke gait rehabilitation, with particular emphasis on auditory–motor integration and cortical plasticity.

Neurophysiological findings indicate enhanced functional connectivity between auditory and motor cortical areas, increased activation of premotor cortex and supplementary motor area, and elevated corticospinal excitability in the affected hemisphere following RAS training. EEG-based studies revealed modulation of alpha-band activity and improved sensorimotor synchronization, suggesting stabilization of neural oscillatory timing mechanisms.

When compared with robotic-assisted gait training, functional electrical stimulation (FES), and virtual reality (VR)-based interventions, RAS exhibits a distinct temporal-organizational mechanism. Robotic systems primarily enhance movement repetition and biomechanical alignment, whereas FES targets peripheral motor activation. VR interventions predominantly engage visuospatial and motivational pathways. In contrast, RAS directly influences internal motor timing and auditory–motor coupling, potentially serving as a central synchronizing framework that can be integrated with other modalities. Emerging closed-loop and real-time auditory feedback systems further support the feasibility of personalized, adaptive entrainment strategies in ecological walking environments.

Current evidence supports RAS as an effective, scalable, and neurophysiologically grounded intervention for improving gait performance after stroke. Beyond symptomatic gait enhancement, RAS appears to induce measurable changes in cortical network organization and sensorimotor integration. Future high-powered mechanistic RCTs incorporating multimodal neuroimaging and standardized dosing protocols are required to optimize patient stratification and define long-term neuroplastic effects. Integration of RAS within multimodal rehabilitation paradigms may enhance functional recovery by targeting the temporal architecture of motor control.

References

GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795-820. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0.

Winstein CJ, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: 2023 update. Stroke. 2023;54(6):e364-e467. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000432.

Ross JM, Balasubramaniam R. Auditory-motor entrainment in rehabilitation: neural mechanisms and clinical implications. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;138:104702. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104702.

Leow LA, Parrott T, Grahn JA. Individual differences in auditory-motor synchronization and neural plasticity after stroke. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;30:102613. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102613.

Wang L, Peng JL, Xiang W, Huang YJ, Chen AL. Effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on motor function and balance ability in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical randomized controlled studies. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:879224. doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.879224.

Gonzalez-Hoelling S, et al. Effectiveness of rhythmic auditory cueing in neurological rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(4):1123. doi:10.3390/jcm13041123.

Choi W, et al. Cortical reorganization associated with rhythmic auditory cueing training in chronic stroke. Brain Sci. 2021;11(9):1163. doi:10.3390/brainsci11091163.

Gonzalez-Hoelling S, et al. The effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on functional ambulation after stroke: a systematic review. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024;24:43. doi:10.1186/s12906-023-04310-3.

Awad LN, et al. Efficacy and safety of using auditory-motor entrainment to improve walking after stroke: a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Nat Commun. 2024;15:1054. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44791-5.

Kim SJ, Kim SM, Jang SH. Comparison of rhythmic auditory stimulation gait training with and without vibrotactile feedback on balance and gait in persons with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Bioengineering. 2025;12(11):1177. doi:10.3390/bioengineering12111177.

Teasell R, Salbach NM, Foley N, Mountain A, et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. Part One: Rehabilitation and Recovery Following Stroke; 6th Edition Update 2019. Int J Stroke. 2020;15(7):763–88. 10.1177/1747493019897843.

Braun Janzen T, Koshimori Y, Richard NM, Thaut MH. Rhythm and Music-Based Interventions in Motor Rehabilitation: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;15:1–21. 10.3389/fnhum.2021.789467.

Magee WL, Clark I, Tamplin J, Bradt J. Music interventions for acquired brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1:CD006787. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006787.pub3

Thaut MH. Advances in the role of music in neurorehabilitation: Addressing critical gaps in clinical applications. Thaut M, ed. NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;48(2):153–153. 10.3233/NRE-208010

Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Rice RR. Rhythmic auditory stimulation in gait training for stroke rehabilitation. J Neurol Sci. 1997;151(2):207–212. doi:10.1016/S0022-510X(97)00146-9

Ahmed GM, et al. Efficacy of rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait parameters in hemiplegic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatr Neurosurg. 2023;59:64. doi:10.1186/s41983-023-00606-w

Calautti C, Baron JC. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(6):1553–1566. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000071761.36075.A

Gonzalez-Hoelling S, Bertran-Noguer C, Reig-Garcia G, Suñer-Soler R. Effects of a music-based rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait and balance in subacute stroke. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):2032. doi:10.3390/ijerph18042032

Chen JL, Penhune VB, Zatorre RJ. Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18(12):2844–2854. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn042

Schaefer RS. Auditory rhythmic cueing in movement rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:817. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00817

Altenmüller E, Schlaug G. Apollo’s gift: new aspects of neurologic music therapy. Prog Brain Res. 2015;217:237–252. doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.11.029

Wang L, Hu X, Wang J, et al. Effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on motor function and balance ability in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:879224. doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.879224.

Liu T, Luo K, Zhou K, et al. Analysis of electroencephalography characteristics during walking in stroke patients under different conditions: a cross-sectional study. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2024;85(9):1–11. doi:10.12968/hmed.2024.0237.

Sarmukadam K, Nejati V, Behroozmand R. Effective neural connectivity deficits during speech auditory feedback processing in post-stroke aphasia: an fMRI study. Cortex. 2025;190:68–85. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2025.06.008.

Sheffler LR, Chae J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. Muscle Nerve. 2021;63(5):555–566. doi:10.1002/mus.27171.

Gangemi A, Colombo R, Fabio RA, et al. Effects of virtual reality cognitive training on neuroplasticity in patients with stroke: a quasi-randomized clinical trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023;17:1216680. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1216680.

Araki S, Miyazaki T, Shibasaki J, et al. Examination of effect and responder to real-time auditory feedback during overground gait for stroke: a randomized cross-over study. Sci Rep. 2025;15:8519. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-93262-4.

Published

2026-05-28

How to Cite

AUDIOMOTOR INTEGRATION AND CORTICAL PLASTICITY IN THE APPLICATION OF RHYTHMIC AUDITORY STIMULATION (RAS) IN POST-STROKE PATIENTS. (2026). Physical Culture and Sport: Scientific Perspective, 2, 24-31. https://doi.org/10.31891/pcs.2026.2.3