PHYSICAL THERAPY AFTER SUPRASPINATUS TENDON REPAIR IN ACTIVE-DUTY MILITARY PERSONNEL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31891/pcs.2026.1.21

Keywords:

supraspinatus tendon repair, rotator cuff reconstruction, postoperative physical therapy, military personnel, shoulder joint mobility, neuromuscular control, scapulohumeral rhythm

Abstract

Rotator cuff injuries, particularly tears of the supraspinatus tendon, are among the leading causes of upper limb dysfunction in working-age individuals and military personnel. Despite continuous advancements in arthroscopic repair techniques and fixation materials, postoperative functional outcomes remain variable.

The aim of this study was to provide scientific justification for and to develop a staged physical therapy program following arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair in the early post-immobilization period.

Initial assessment revealed significant impairment of shoulder joint mobility (ICF code b710), decreased muscle strength and activation efficiency of the rotator cuff (b730), protective neuromuscular inhibition (b735), and moderate pain (b280). Activity limitations included difficulties with reaching, lifting, and performing self-care tasks (d445, d430, d540), accompanied by compensatory trunk movements and altered scapulohumeral rhythm (d410). Participation restrictions were observed in occupational activities and physically demanding leisure activities (d850, d920). The rehabilitation program was developed according to a hierarchical ICF-based model, with gradual progression from correction of body function impairments to restoration of activity and participation. Interventions were implemented across three phases (0–4 weeks, 5–8 weeks, 9–16 weeks), taking into account the biological phases of tendon healing.

During the first stage, emphasis was placed on controlled restoration of mobility without compromising the integrity of the surgical repair. By week 4, active shoulder abduction improved from 30° to 65°, flexion from 40° to 75°, and external rotation from 5° to 20°, with pain reduced to ≤3 points on the NRS. The second stage focused on developing active motor control and reducing compensatory strategies; by week 8, active abduction reached 95°, flexion 105°, and external rotation 35°, accompanied by substantial normalization of scapular coordination. In the final stage, functional restoration was prioritized. By week 16, active abduction increased to 120°, flexion to 130°, and external rotation to 45°, while pain decreased to 1–2 points. The patient regained independence in overhead activities and gradually returned to occupational and physically demanding tasks.

References

Longo UG, Berton A, Papapietro N, et al. Epidemiology, genetics and biological factors of rotator cuff tears. Med Sport Sci. 2019;64:1-9. doi:10.1159/000493508

Haunschild ED, Gilat R, Lavoie-Gagne O, et al. Return to work after primary rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021;30(10):e635-e645. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2021.03.147

Klouche S, Lefevre N, Herman S, Gerometta A, Bohu Y. Return to sport after rotator cuff tear repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(8):1877-1887. doi:10.1177/0363546516653839

Rossi LA, Brand JC, Provencher MT. Return to sport after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(4):1345-1356. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.042

Saltzman BM, Jain A, Campbell KA, et al. Does early motion lead to a higher failure rate after rotator cuff repair? Arthroscopy. 2020;36(1):288-300. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.042

Scanaliato JP, Dunn JC, Bradley JP. Outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in active-duty military patients younger than 40 years. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10(2):23259671211069820. doi:10.1177/23259671211069820

Waterman BR, Cameron KL, Hsiao M, Langston JR, Clark NJ, Owens BD. Return to duty after shoulder surgery in active-duty military patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(11):e354-e361. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.026

Hu Y, Chen J, Chen S, et al. Early versus delayed mobilization following rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24:894. doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06903-2

Houck DA, Kraeutler MJ, Schuette HB, McCarty EC, Bravman JT. Early versus delayed motion after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(12):2911-2915. doi:10.1177/0363546517692543

Mazuquin B, Moffatt M, Gill P, Selfe J, Rees J, Drew S, et al. Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0252137. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252137

Hu CW, Tsai SHL, Chen CH, Tang HC, Su CY, Tischler EH, et al. Early versus delayed mobilization for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (small to large sized tear): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):938. doi:10.1186/s12891-023-07075-5

Paolucci T, Agostini F, Conti M, Cazzolla S, Mussomeli E, Santilli G, et al. Comparison of early versus traditional rehabilitation protocol after rotator cuff repair: an umbrella-review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(21):6743. doi:10.3390/jcm12216743

Schönweger F, Marbach F, Feltri P, Milev SR, Filardo G, Candrian C. Sling is not inferior to brace immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy. 2025;41(7):2283-2293. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2024.12.023

Nikpay A, Rouhani A, Elmi A, Mahdipour S. Comparative analysis of early versus delayed rehabilitation protocols following rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop. 2025;73:381-386. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2025.12.048

Moussa MK, Lang E, Gerometta A, Karam K, Chelli M, Grimaud O, et al. Return to sports and activities after arthroscopic treatments for rotator cuff lesions in young patients less than 45-years-old: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(13):3703. doi:10.3390/jcm13133703

Scanaliato JP, Eckhoff MD, Dunn JC, Czajkowski H, Fink WA, Parnes N. Long-term results of arthroscopic repair of full-thickness traumatic rotator cuff tears in active duty military patients under the age of 40 years. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(10):2753-2760. doi:10.1177/03635465221107371

Ezell DJ, Wilckens JH, Awwad D, Cohen SB, Ciccotti MG, Lee S, et al. Rotator cuff repair rehabilitation considerations and respective guidelines: a narrative review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021;16.

Thigpen CA, Shaffer MA, Gaunt BW, et al. The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists’ consensus statement on rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(2):387-404. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.032

Littlewood C, Malliaras P, Chance-Larsen K. The central nervous system in shoulder pain: implications for rehabilitation. Phys Ther Sport. 2022;53:64-71. doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.11.002

Sciarretta FV, et al. Current concepts in rotator cuff rehabilitation. SICOT J. 2023;9:32. doi:10.1051/sicotj/2023032

Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(1):116-123. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.012

Chen Y, Meng H, Li Y, et al. The effect of rehabilitation timing on functional recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ. 2024;12:e17395. doi:10.7717/peerj.17395

Published

2026-03-26

How to Cite

PHYSICAL THERAPY AFTER SUPRASPINATUS TENDON REPAIR IN ACTIVE-DUTY MILITARY PERSONNEL. (2026). Physical Culture and Sport: Scientific Perspective, 1, 568-577. https://doi.org/10.31891/pcs.2026.1.21