ANATOMICAL EDUCATION IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES: CURRENT CHALLENGES AND PATHWAYS FOR IMPROVEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31891/pcs.2025.2.31Keywords:
anatomy, physical therapy and rehabilitation, interdisciplinary integration, emerging technologies, anatomical training of learnersAbstract
This article presents a comprehensive meta-analysis of the current state of anatomical education in the field of rehabilitation sciences, particularly in the training of specialists in physical therapy, occupational therapy, and sports rehabilitation. It reviews studies addressing the key challenges facing traditional approaches to teaching anatomy in the context of digitalization, interdisciplinary integration, and increasing clinical demands. The focus is on the need to adapt educational programs to the needs of the 21st century, especially through the implementation of innovative technologies (VR/AR, 3D modeling, simulation platforms), gamification strategies, blended learning, and functionally oriented methods. The study analyzes scientific sources, including empirical research, systematic reviews, and pedagogical interventions conducted between 2018 and 2025. It finds that effective anatomical training requires a combination of classical methods (dissection, anatomical atlases) and digital tools that provide interactivity, spatial visualization, and clinical relevance. Special attention is given to the role of the educator as an interdisciplinary facilitator capable of integrating anatomical knowledge into clinical contexts. The results of the meta-analysis indicate a positive impact of multimodal approaches on academic performance, motivation, critical thinking, and students’ clinical competence. At the same time, several issues are identified, including unequal access to resources, lack of pedagogical training among instructors, and the absence of standardized criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of innovative methods. In conclusion, the authors justify the need for strategic modernization of anatomical education in rehabilitation sciences based on evidence-based pedagogy, digital transformation, interdisciplinary approaches, and a focus on practical clinical skills. Promising directions for further research are proposed, including the development of integrated educational models, the study of the impact of digital technologies on clinical reasoning, and the creation of competency-based curricula.
References
Hnatiuk M. S., Kobzar O. B., Pivtorak V. I., Slabyi O. B. Modernizatsiia vykladannia klinichnoi anatomiї u medychnykh zakladakh vyshchoї osvity Ukraїny [Elektronnyi resurs]. Medychna osvita, 2024. DOI: 10.11603/m.2414-5998.2024.4.15138.
Lopushniak L. Ya., Boichuk O. M., Honcharenko V. A., Sukhonosov R. O., Kondrusyk N. Yu. Zastosuvannia pedahohichnykh tekhnolohii pry vykladanni studentam dystsypliny «Anatomiia liudyny». Colloquium Journal, 2024. № 20 (213). S. 22–25.
Romaniuk A. P., Shevchuk T. Ya., Aponchuk L. S. Vyvchennia osvitnoho komponentu «Funktsionalna anatomiia u terapiї ta reabilitatsiї» iz zastosuvanniam stolu anatomičnoї vizualizatsiї Briolight. Tsifrovi instrumenty u suchasnii osviti: materialy dopovidei (statei, tez) uchasnykiv/uchasnyts II nauk.-prakt. internet-konf. (m. Lutsk, 31 zhovtnia 2023), Lutsk: KZVO «Lutskyi pedahohichnyi koledzh», 2023. S. 273–274.
Advances in anatomy education: virtual anatomy tables, immersive techniques, 3D printing. MDPI Journals, 2025.
Are Serious Games an Effective Teaching Tool in Anatomy Education? A Systematic Review. MDPI Journals, 2023.
Barmaki R., Abtahi F., Rafiee M., Noroozi O. Screen‑based 3D Visualization and Augmented Reality Tools for Human Anatomy Education [Electronic resource]. ResearchGate, 2023. Access mode: [https://www.researchgate.net](https://www.researchgate.net)
Chytas D. et al. Relevance of cadaveric dissection in anatomy education. Annals of Anatomy, 2020.
Dao T., Pouletaut P., Gamet D., Tho M. Real-Time Rehabilitation System of Systems for Monitoring the Biomechanical Feedbacks of the Musculoskeletal System. Springer, 2014. Access mode: [https://consensus.app/papers/realtime-rehabilitation-system-of-systems-for-monitoring-dao-pouletaut/6b546217237258d4a4e9eef33e62292e](https://consensus.app/papers/realtime-rehabilitation-system-of-systems-for-monitoring-dao-pouletaut/6b546217237258d4a4e9eef33e62292e)
Dereli B., Kahraman H. Gamification in Physical Therapy Education. SpringerLink, 2024.
Dove J. et al. Gross and Applied Anatomy Pedagogical Approaches in Occupational Therapy Education: A Scoping Review. PubMed, 2024. Access mode: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Hamza F., Yameen K., Khursheed M., Jalil S., Khan A. Teaching Anatomy in Rehabilitation Sciences: Perceptions of Undergraduate Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy and Sports Sciences Students of Ziauddin University, Pakistan. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 2024. Vol. 4, № 1. Access mode: [https://consensus.app/papers/teaching-anatomy-in-rehabilitation-sciences-perceptions-hamza-yameen/a0efad5147ee52e8815abbf41ff05bf4](https://consensus.app/papers/teaching-anatomy-in-rehabilitation-sciences-perceptions-hamza-yameen/a0efad5147ee52e8815abbf41ff05bf4)
Jorge J. et al. Anatomy Studio II: A Cross-Reality Application for Teaching Anatomy [Electronic resource], 2022. Access mode: [https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org](https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org)
Khalil M. K. et al. The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: Systematic review. Wiley Online Library, 2018.
Mathiowetz V. et al. Usefulness of anatomy content in occupational therapy practice. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2014.
Nicholson D. T. et al. Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomized controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Medical Education, 2016.
Patel K. M., Moxham B. J. Attitudes of medical and dental students to dissection. Clinical Anatomy, 2019.
Sandoval-Hernández L. et al. Effectiveness of gamification strategies in health education. Springer, 2023.
Shead T. et al. Curricular and pedagogical aspects of gross anatomy education for undergraduate physiotherapy students: a scoping review. PubMed, 2020.
Studie. Effectiveness of digital and analog learning methods for learning anatomical structures in physiotherapy education. Google Scholar, 2024.
Sugand K., Abrahams P., Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2010.
Teaching Methodologies of Gross Anatomy Education for Undergraduate Physiotherapy Students: An Updated Scoping Review. MDPI Journals, 2023.
Virtual reality in medical education during COVID-19 [Electronic resource]. Wikipedia, 2022. Access mode: [https://www.wikipedia.org](https://www.wikipedia.org)
Yap C., Than A. Enhancing Medical Anatomy Education through Virtual Reality (VR): Design, Development, and Evaluation // arXiv., 2024. Access mode: [https://arxiv.org](https://arxiv.org)
You J. et al. Functional electrical stimulation improves upper limb function in stroke patients: A meta-analysis. PubMed, 2023.
Youdas J. W., Krause D. A., Hellyer N. J. Teaching gross anatomy in a physical therapy curriculum: Student perceptions of peer teaching and exposure to dissection. PubMed, 2008. Access mode: [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Альона РОМАНЮК, Тетяна ШЕВЧУК, Людмила АПОНЧУК, Микола МАЙСТРУК, Сергій КРИВОВ'ЯЗ

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



