METHODOLOGICAL BASICS OF TRAINING FUTURE SCIENCE TEACHERS USING THE PRINCIPLES OF DIFFERENTIATION AND INDIVIDUALIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31891/pcs.2024.2.20Keywords:
methodology, scientific approaches, professional competence, differentiation and individualization of education, professional training, future teachers of natural sciencesAbstract
A successful solution to the problem of quality training of future teachers of natural sciences involves the activation of pedagogical efforts in a number of ways, the most important of which is the individualization and differentiation of education. The effectiveness of the training of future teachers of natural sciences using the principles of differentiation and individualization of education is related to the correct choice of the methodological foundations of this process, a specific set of methodological approaches, principles and laws. The purpose of the article is to analyze the methodological foundations of training future teachers of natural sciences using the principles of differentiation and individualization. To determine the theoretical foundations of the researched phenomenon, a set of interrelated research methods was used - analytical and comparative study and analysis of philosophical, psychological, pedagogical, scientific and methodological literature, regulatory legal documents, forecasting, generalization and conclusions. Research results. Methodological bases of training future teachers of natural sciences using the principles of differentiation and individualization define the key provisions of systemic, competence-based, practice-oriented and individual methodological approaches. The system approach makes it possible to consider the differentiated and individualized training of future teachers of natural sciences as a system from the standpoint of its structure, content, functions, set of methods, and system connections. A competent approach specifies the goal and final result of the training of future teachers of natural sciences. Practically oriented and individual methodological approaches make it possible to choose effective forms, methods, technologies and means of differentiated and individualized training of future teachers of natural sciences.
References
Akimova, O., & Haluziak, V. (2019). Pedahohichnyi suprovid osobystisno-profesiinoho rozvytku maibutnoho vchytelia [Pedagogical support of personal and professional development of the future teacher]. [Monohrafiia]. Vinnytsia: «Tvory», 340 [in Ukrainian].
Alieksieieva, S. V. (2022). Aktualni problemy dydaktyky v umovakh informatyzatsii osvity: indyvidualizatsiia navchannia [Actual problems of didactics in the conditions of informatization of education: individualization of education]. Nauka i tekhnika sohodni – Science and Technology Today, 1 (1), 18–26 [in Ukrainian].
Blashkova, O. (2019). Kliuchovi kompetentnosti maibutnikh vchyteliv pryrodnychykh spetsialnostei ta yikh vplyv na formuvannia svitohliadnykh oriientyriv suchasnoi studentskoi molodi [Key competences of future teachers of natural sciences and their influence on the formation of worldview orientations of modern student youth]. Molod i rynok – Youth and the market, 5 (172), 184–189 [in Ukrainian].
Borshchuk, Ye. M. (2011). Systemnyi pidkhid i synerhetyka [System approach and synergy]. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy – Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Bioresources and Nature Management of Ukraine, 21 (1), 344–347 [in Ukrainian].
Kolesnyk, M. O. (2020). Suchasnyi osvitnii prostir: nova paradyhma pryrodnychoi osvity [Modern educational space: a new paradigm of science education]. [Monohrafiia]. Chernihiv: Desna-Polihraf, 270 [in Ukrainian].
Kremen V. H. (Red.). (2014). Synerhetyka i osvita [Synergetics and education]. [Monohrafiia]. K.: Instytut obdarovanoi dytyny, 348 [in Ukrainian].
Krushelnytska, O. (2013). Metodolohiia ta orhanizatsiia naukovykh doslidzhen [Methodology and organization of scientific research]. [Navchalnyi posibnyk]. K.: Kondor, 189 [in Ukrainian].
Levchenko, T. I. (2017). Kontseptualna paradyhma rozvytku vyshchoi osvity [Conceptual paradigm of higher education development]. [Monohrafiia]. Vinnytsia: Nova Knyha, 344 [in Ukrainian].
Mulesa, P. (2023). Kontseptsiia pidhotovky maibutnikh uchyteliv matematyky ta informatyky do vykorystannia zasobiv virtualnoi naochnosti u profesiinii diialnosti [The concept of training future teachers of mathematics and informatics to use virtual visualization tools in their professional activities]. Fizyko-matematychna osvita – Physical and mathematical education, 38 (1), 54–59 [in Ukrainian].
Onyshchuk, L. A. (2015). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady konstruiuvannia ta realizatsii zmistu osvity [Theoretical and methodological principles of construction and implementation of educational content.]. Osvita doroslykh: teoriia, dovid, perspektyvy – Adult education: theory, evidence, perspectives, 1 (12), 45–53 [in Ukrainian].
Savitska, V. V. (2022). Teoretyko-metodolohichni osnovy proiektuvannia osvitnoho protsesu u zakladakh vyshchoi osvity v umovakh tsyfrovizatsii [Theoretical and methodological bases of designing the educational process in institutions of higher education in conditions of digitalization]. Innovatsiini tekhnolohii navchannia v umovakh modernizatsii suchasnoi osvity – Innovative learning technologies in the conditions of modernization of modern education, L. Rebukha (red.) (s. 67–83) [in Ukrainian].
Solovei, L. V. (2018). Formuvannia kliuchovykh kompetentnostei maibutnikh uchyteliv pryrodnychykh spetsialnostei u fakhovii pidhotovtsi [Formation of key competencies of future teachers of natural sciences in professional training]. (Dys. ... kand. ped. nauk zi spetsialnosti 13.00.04). Klasychnyi pryvat. un-tet. Zaporizhzhia, 306 [in Ukrainian].
Sonko, S. P. (2013). Prostorovyi rozvytok sotsio-pryrodnykh system: shliakh do novoi paradyhmy [Spatial development of socio-natural systems: the path to a new paradigm]. Kyiv: Nyka Tsentr, 287 [in Ukrainian].
Tverezivska, N. T., & Sydorenko, V. K. (2013). Metodolohiia pedahohichnoho doslidzhennia [Methodology of pedagogical research]. [Navch. posib.]. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 440 [in Ukrainian].
Kelly, G. A. (2011). A Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton. Repinted by Routledge, 190.
Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The Theoretical and Empirical Basis of Teacher Leadership: A Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 87 (1), 134–171.
